Comments on: Labor of Division (Episode 1) http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/ serious code Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:07:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Leonardo Boiko http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1010 Leonardo Boiko Tue, 04 May 2010 19:51:54 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-1010 Site seems to work just fine here in Chrome. Also, the header “The answer to the question right above this line” made me notice there _are_ lines in the paper separating sections and comments. Aand, they scale. Well-played, sir. Site seems to work just fine here in Chrome.

Also, the header “The answer to the question right above this line” made me notice there _are_ lines in the paper separating sections and comments. Aand, they scale. Well-played, sir.

]]> By: phil http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-995 phil Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:28:58 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-995 deschd deschd

]]> By: Anonymous http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-994 Anonymous Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:08:16 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-994 Checking pi Checking pi

]]> By: Martin http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-989 Martin Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:32:12 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-989 You know, its great that you are posting again. Please keep up the great work! Regards, Martin You know, its great that you are posting again. Please keep up the great work!

Regards,
Martin

]]> By: Anonymous http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-988 Anonymous Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:22:52 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-988 t t

]]> By: Anonymous http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Anonymous Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:48:31 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-976 spam spam

]]> By: Lmm http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-975 Lmm Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:52:38 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-975 Shouldn't that t = ((n-q) >> 2) + q be t = ((n-q) >> 1) + q? Shouldn’t that t = ((n-q) >> 2) + q be t = ((n-q) >> 1) + q?

]]> By: a http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-973 a Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:37:22 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-973 Spam Filter? Spam Filter?

]]> By: Anonymous http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-972 Anonymous Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:50:02 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-972 pie is yummy pie is yummy

]]> By: Anonymous http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/archives/2010/02/15/labor-of-division-episode-1/comment-page-1/#comment-971 Anonymous Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:27:28 +0000 http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/?p=230#comment-971 dsdsdsds dsdsdsds

]]>